Topic: wisdom of
emptiness.
According to the sixth perfection
we can found that the wisdom of emptiness excerpt from ‘awakening the mind from
basic Buddhist meditations by Geshe Namgyal Wangchen, The fully awakened clear
state of mind that realizes the truth of emptiness. As we know the emptiness of
inherent existence is the wisdom we seek. Hence, it is called prajna in
Sanskrit. When we achieve this wisdom we are able to realize emptiness from the
depth of our own personal experience, beyond intellectualization.
Only this wisdom has the true
power to cut our delusions from their root completely. No matter how many other
virtuous qualities we may have, there is no way to achieve the complete
elimination of our delusion unless and until the full realization of emptiness
is gained. Therefore, whether we seek liberation, it is essential for us to
seek this wisdom.
To gain the full realization of
emptiness we must necessarily have developed our inner understanding to the
point where we can fully negate the inherently existent self. Yet at the same
time not fail to maintain the conventional reality of the self the truth that
self does exist in general. This is the perfect middle way of understanding
emptiness, as taught by Buddha and elaborated by master Nagarjuna, who
established the Madhyamika, or middle way school. However, we cannot gain the
full realization of emptiness without a foundation. Hence Buddha taught the
emptiness of the substantially existent self and the emptiness of the
externally existent self as a base for understanding the most subtle emptiness,
the emptiness of inherent existence.
Among the followers of Buddha’s
teachings on emptiness there arose four different lineage holders of his
teachings on emptiness, known as the four tenets of Buddhist schools:
1. Vaibashika
( followers of the early commentaries realist - the Mahavibhasa on the sutras)
2. Sautantrika
(sutra citers/ sutra followers)
3. Cittamatra
( mind only)
4. Madhyamika
( the middle way)
The Madhyamaka school holds the
view that the emptiness of the inherently existence as elaborated by Nagarjuna.
The first two forms of emptiness, the emptiness of the substantially existent
self and the emptiness of the externally existent self are taught as steps towards
the full understanding of the most subtle emptiness.
The importance of seeking is the
truth of emptiness: the truth of emptiness of all Buddha’s teachings. The
realization of the truth is not only the ultimate method for us to cut our
delusion from their root, but is also key path that leads us to the perfect
state of Buddhahood. It is important to cut our delusions if we truly wish to
be liberated from the suffering of samsara, not to mention how important it is
for us to control and eliminate our own delusion to be able to help others
effectively and in a sincere and pure way. Hence as Buddha says in the perfection
sutras: the wisdom realize the emptiness of the inherently existent self is the
mother of both those who reach beyond the suffering of cycle existence for
their own peace and those who attain enlightenment for the sake of all beings.
Similarly Chandrakirti points
out: all those who go beyond cyclic existence have attained their libration
through the perfect teaching of the enlightened ones. These are born from
bodhisattvas who fully develop themselves to benefit others. Bodhisattvas in
turn are born from three seeds only: the realization of emptiness he mined of
enlightenment and great compassion. If we look at the origin of our anger,
attachment and so on, we can clearly see from our own experience that they
arise from our misconception of self, holding the view the ‘I’ exists
inherently. Thus it is clear why only the realization of emptiness has the
power to cut our delusion completely. No matter how much and for how long we
might concentrate on understanding emptiness according to the middle way.
The pure understanding of
emptiness as taught by Buddha and elaborated by the great nagarjuna and
subsequently by his two main disciples, Buddhapalita and Chandrakirti, is the
understanding of emptiness according to the middle way: completely negating the
inherently existent self whilst maintaining the existence of the self that is
commonly known to everyone without damaging it. This realization is what lama Tsong
Khapa Calles the union of the two truths. This means that although our self
lacks an inherently existent nature, it nevertheless exists and carries out
activities, good actions leading to happiness and bad actions lead to
unhappiness. Each and every thing that exists has two natures: an ultimate
nature and a conventional nature we have no trouble understanding the law of
cause and effect.
It is most important that we
differentiate between which kind of self should be negated and which should be
maintained. If we negate too much, we will find it difficult to maintain the
self that is commonly known to us and that is the base of our identification.
If we negate this normal self, we will have problem in maintaining our
understanding of the law of cause and effect. We will see no point in virtuous
actions and not understand that our suffering is the result of past
non-virtuous actions. This is the extreme of nihilism. For those who truly wish
to understand the root of suffering, it is very important to maintain the self
that is responsible for happiness and unhappiness. The self cannot be reduced
to our material body; it is more than this; it is something that comes from our
past lives and goes onto the next life. Seeing this, we can understand that the
suffering we experience does not come from outside, but it is a consequence of
our karma. Happiness also comes from past lives. Our virtuous actions of this
life can lead to happiness in our next life. Our practice of dharma can
eventually lead us to enlightenment.
However, when we come to
establish that the self is not something limited to our material body but comes
from past lives and goes to the next life, some people non- Buddhist masters.
For example: go to the extreme of
eternalism. They believe that the self exists independently and eternally. On
the one hand this belief helps to maintain our understanding ok karma; on the
other hand, however it strengthens our self-grasping because it views the self
as something solid. This leads us to cling to our self thus keeping us bound to
the suffering of cyclic existence.
Therefore Buddha taught the
middle way: that self in not limited to this very material body, but comes from
our past life and goes onto the next. It does not exist solidly but is
something merely imputed or labeled by our mind on the basis of the aggregates
of which we are composed. If we do not negate enough then we will not be able
to negate the inherently existent self which the mind clings. As a result we
will not be able to eliminate our delusions.
Nagarjuna says: The nihilistic
view only leads to the misery of taking rebirth in the lower realms and binds
us to the suffering of cyclic existence. Therefore only the middle way, which
is free from these two extreme views, can lead us to true liberation.
In the traditional analytical
contemplation on emptiness there are three stages:
1. Recognizing
the appearance of the inherently existent self,
2. Negating
the inherently existent self,
3. Maintain
the meditation on the emptiness of the inherently existent self.
Conclusion:
The wisdom of emptiness is the
ultimate teaching in Buddhism. Its main tenet is that our suffering is caused
by our inability to perceive the true nature of reality. There teachings on
emptiness are very subtle, profound and deeply transforming. Yet with correct
understanding. Wisdom in Buddhism can refer to two types of insight:
conventional wisdom and ultimate wisdom. So, conventional wisdom relates to
understanding the conventional world, or the world as we know it. Ultimate wisdom refers to direct realization
which is non-dualistic, and contradicts the way in whcivh we ordinary perceive
the world.